0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:52:30 EDT 2022 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh4l with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 858 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HUHPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 861 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HUHPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # Proof found! 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_22, type, cP: a > a > a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_23, type, cE: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_24, type, cJ: a > a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_27, type, esk3_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_28, type, esk4_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_29, type, esk5_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(cTHM22_pme, conjecture, (((![X1:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X1)=(X1)))&![X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X2) @ X2)=(cE))))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3)))))=>(![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3))))&![X4:a, X5:a]:((?[X6:a]:(((cP @ X4 @ X6)=(X5)))&?[X7:a]:(((cP @ X7 @ X4)=(X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM22_pme)). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((![X1:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X1)=(X1)))&![X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X2) @ X2)=(cE))))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3)))))=>(![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3))))&![X4:a, X5:a]:((?[X6:a]:(((cP @ X4 @ X6)=(X5)))&?[X7:a]:(((cP @ X7 @ X4)=(X5)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM22_pme])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X20:a, X21:a, X22:a, X23:a, X24:a, X30:a, X31:a]:((((((cP @ cE @ X20)=(X20))&((cP @ (cJ @ X21) @ X21)=(cE)))&((cP @ (cP @ X22 @ X23) @ X24)=(cP @ X22 @ (cP @ X23 @ X24))))&(((cP @ (cP @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0) @ esk3_0)!=(cP @ esk1_0 @ (cP @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)))|(((cP @ esk4_0 @ X30)!=(esk5_0))|((cP @ X31 @ esk4_0)!=(esk5_0)))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ (cP @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0) @ esk3_0)!=(cP @ esk1_0 @ (cP @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)))|((cP @ esk4_0 @ X1)!=(esk5_0))|((cP @ X2 @ esk4_0)!=(esk5_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X1)=(cE))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X1)=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ esk4_0)!=(esk5_0))|((cP @ esk4_0 @ X2)!=(esk5_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ (cP @ X1 @ X2))=(X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_6])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ esk4_0))!=(esk5_0))|((cP @ esk4_0 @ X3)!=(esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ (cJ @ X1)) @ X2)=(cP @ X1 @ X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_8])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ cE)!=(esk5_0))|((cP @ esk4_0 @ X2)!=(esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_5])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ cE)=(X1))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_5]), c_0_10])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ (cJ @ X1))=(cE))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_10])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ esk4_0 @ X1)!=(esk5_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ (cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X2))=(X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_13]), c_0_6])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 8 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 38 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 10 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 27 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 5 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 5 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 119 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 73 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 114 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 3 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 37 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 14 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 38 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1389 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.010 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages 0.21/0.49 EOF